![]() ![]()
The standard components of a psychology experiment-groups, blocks, trials, and factors-are all represented graphically, and experiments are constructed by working with these elements in interactive windows and dialogs. PsyScope relies on the interactive graphic environment provided by Macintosh computers to accomplish this goal. The primary goal of PsyScope is to give both psychology students and trained researchers a tool that allows them to design experiments without the need for programming. It, in turn, borrows DEC concepts from the 1960s.PsyScope is an integrated environment for designing and running psychology experiments on Macintosh computers. Taking it to the extreme, MS-DOS was in turn "inspired" (some might say shamelessly copied from) by CP/M, and CP/M dates back to the early 1970s. PSYSCOPE WINDOWS WINDOWS 7Most of Windows 7 was designed in the 1980s. Actually, it goes further back, since much of NT is directly based on older versions of Windows going back to the mid-1980s, as well as MS-DOS. This goes all the way back to when NT was first designed in the late 1980s. XP was not new, it was an updated version of Windows 2000, which in turn was an updated version of NT 4. Microsoft has never started from scratch. How long are you willing to wait? Are you willing to wait until 2020 for this new OS to reach a mature level? They have to start from scratch!!!!!!!!!! I think Microsoft is doing this whole thing cuz of the ipad and that is just stupid. I mean the best by far is xp because it was the only one that was compeletly from scratch unlike what they are gonna do and so no one is gonna like it. PSYSCOPE WINDOWS WINDOWS 8The whole windows 8 thing is just stupid. PSYSCOPE WINDOWS SOFTWAREOr could your complaint perhaps be about third-party software storing private data in the registry? If so, you need to complain to the application creator. ![]() This data is not even intended to be human-readable. If that was going to be changed, substantially changes would have to be made to Windows, and you would have to be willing to lose all backwards compatibility (unless you want to add a new compatibility layer, radically reducing performance even further). Or is your actual complaint about the structure of the OS data Windows stores in the registry? Well, that is a separate matter. Where do you want it? A SQL database? Jet Blue? Tens of thousands of plain text files (remember that Windows makes extensive use of access control)? What would any of these options accomplish other than reducing performance? If you got rid of it, Windows would still have the store the exact same data somewhere else. The registry is a raw database, nothing more. Second, common Linux file systems like ext2 do in fact suffer from fragmentation as well, although they deal with it differently and have little ability to report it.Īs for the registry, I do not think you understand what you're asking for. "*NIX" means nothing in that context, because the various Unix and Unix-like operating systems use a whole range of wildly different file systems that have nothing to do with each other. no registry.Īt least get rid of those 2 things, and I would be happy. I would like to see them get rid of FAT/32 and NTFS as they are terrible filesystems. I agree with the underlying meaning though. ![]() Windows is sorely missing this, largely because of Microsoft neglecting the native world during their failed. There is one important part missing here, and that is a new GUI framework. They tried it once, and it was one of the biggest mistakes in Microsoft's history.Īs for Direct2D and DirectWrite, well, you can make some limited use of them, but one is a raw graphics API and the other ia text rendering API. ![]() There is a reason why no part of Windows is managed (with the exception of parts of Media Center, if you count that as part of Windows.) It's going to stay the same for Windows 8 as well. PSYSCOPE WINDOWS CODEWPF would mean having to port all the code to a managed language, and that is never going to happen. Regarding the UI - it could easily be solved if they moved all the bundled applications to WPF/Direct2D/DirectWrite and simply leaving the old files there only for backwards compatibility but none of the bundle applications (or any applications by Microsoft) actually using them. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |